These demands also result in longer durations for words ( Bell et al., 2003 Gregory et al., 1999), as does the production of lower-frequency words ( Gahl, 2006). When these demands require speakers to plan complex utterances or prepare upcoming words, they tend to produce disfluent words like “um” or “uh” ( Clark & Fox Tree, 2002), repeat themselves ( Clark & Wasow, 1998), and produce intonational phrase boundaries ( Watson & Gibson, 2004). ![]() Speakers face the challenge of preparing and uttering their conversational contributions in real time, often while also completing other, nonlinguistic tasks. On the other hand, predictable words might be less prominent because they require less effort by the speaker. On the one hand, speakers might aim to produce intelligible language when there is less information from the context to help the listener, as in the case of unpredictable words (e.g., Lieberman, 1963). In contrast, effects of predictability, could be the result of either speaker-centered or listener-centered processes. By marking information that is important, the speaker may help the listener coordinate the information structure of the utterance. Our primary goal is to explore whether these factors are really two aspects of the same thing or whether one or both of these factors contribute independently to the acoustic realization of a word.Ī second goal is to understand whether acoustic prominence is speaker or listener centered. Information that is predictable tends to be less important and information that is not predictable tends to be more important ( Shannon, 1951). Importance and predictability might be two aspects of the same phenomenon. Bard & Aylett, 1999 Lieberman, 1963 Fowler & Housum, 1987), which is associated with a reduction in duration. ![]() Related findings have shown that words that are in predictable contexts tend to have lower intelligibility (e.g. In addition, Gregory (2002) found that words were more likely to be produced without a pitch accent when they were predictable given their context. ![]() Words that are statistically predictable from the preceding linguistic context tend to be produced with shorter duration ( Bell et al., 2003 Gregory et al., 1999). Researchers have also argued that acoustic phenomena associated with pitch accenting, especially duration, are a function of how predictable information is in a discourse. The word “violin” in (1b) receives an accent because, as the answer to the question in (1a), it is the most important part of the sentence. Pierrehumbert & Hirschberg, 1990) as well as the ways in which prominence signals the information structure of a sentence (e.g. Two different factors have been claimed to provide an account of this relationship: 1) the importance of the information to the goals of the interlocutors and 2) the predictability of the information in a given context.īolinger (1972, 1986) argued that the most informative words in a sentence receive an accent and some version of this view has been used to understand differences in accent type (e.g. Although information status is clearly related to whether or not a word receives a pitch accent, the nature of this relationship is less clear.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |